As I continue to improve my photography, I find myself at a crossroads: Nikon Z9 vs. Canon R3. It's time to invest in a high-end camera, and while both options offer incredible performance, key differences make this decision challenging.
I've always loved Nikon's image files—they resonate with me because of their depth and color science. The Z9 is Nikon's flagship mirrorless camera, boasting a stacked sensor, 45.7MP resolution, and no mechanical shutter. It is a powerhouse for both stills and video. However, based on YouTube comparisons and real-world reviews, Nikon's autofocus tracking and stickiness still seem to lag slightly behind Canon's top-tier offerings.
On the other hand, the Canon R3 offers incredible autofocus accuracy, faster subject tracking, and eye-control AF, which could be a game-changer in fast-paced shooting situations. I prefer a vari-angle flippy screen over Nikon's tilting screen, especially for dynamic compositions and video work.
Here's where my dilemma deepens. The Canon R6II offers nearly the same autofocus system as the R3, but at a lower price and with a more compact, lighter body. While the R3's stacked sensor provides an edge in readout speed, the R6II delivers similar real-world autofocus performance with excellent image quality, making me question whether I truly need the R3.
While the Nikon Z9 aligns with my preference for Nikon files, I can't ignore the Canon R3's superior autofocus and flippy screen. At the same time, the Canon R6II offers nearly the same performance as the R3 but is lighter and cheaper, which might make the most practical sense.
What do you think? If you've shot with these cameras, please comment below!